Governmentality as critique : (Record no. 352)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02082nam a22002177a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20230223114614.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 210621b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER | |
International Standard Serial Number | 1949-1255 |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
9 (RLIN) | 256 |
Personal name | Jacobs, Keith |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Governmentality as critique : |
Remainder of title | the diversification and regulation of the Australian housing sector |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | International Journal of Housing Policy, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2015. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | 20 pages |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | KEYWORDS: Australian housing sector, regulation |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | As the housing affordability crisis in Australia deepens, policy-makers have expended considerable resources in establishing new regulatory practices to<br/>enhance the role of the community housing sector. Ostensibly, the rationale for a new tier of regulation is to assure potential institutional investors (e.g.<br/>pension funds, investment trusts and banks) that community housing organisations are accountable and safe places to invest. Our paper adopts an<br/>alternative reading of diversity and housing regulation, drawing upon the governmentality thesis advanced by Michel Foucault in an empirical study about the early stages of regulation of affordable housing providers. Amongst our claims are: first, that policies to diversify and regulate the housing sector constitute a radical political project to commercialise welfare provision and second, these policies are likely to generate additional bureaucratic burdens and close off possibilities for progressive reform. The paper also considers the value of the governmentality approach for critical investigations in the field of housing. |
524 ## - PREFERRED CITATION OF DESCRIBED MATERIALS NOTE | |
Preferred citation of described materials note | To cite this article: Keith Jacobs & Max Travers (2015) Governmentality as critique: the diversification and regulation of the Australian housing sector, International Journal of Housing Policy, 15:3, 304-322, DOI: 10.1080/14616718.2015.1046209 |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
9 (RLIN) | 502 |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Investment & Financialisaton |
Geographic subdivision | Australia |
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
9 (RLIN) | 297 |
Personal name | Travers, Max |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616718.2015.1046209">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616718.2015.1046209</a> |
Link text | View item on publishers website |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
Koha item type | Article |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Use restrictions | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Date last seen | Uniform Resource Identifier | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | Dewey Decimal Classification | No | Yes | No | tunsw | tunsw | 21/06/2021 | 21/06/2021 | https://cfiles.tenantsunion.org.au/f/1463 | 21/06/2021 | Article | |
No | Dewey Decimal Classification | No | No | tunsw | tunsw | 21/06/2021 | 21/06/2021 | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616718.2015.1046209 | 21/06/2021 | Article |