HomeTenants' Union of NSW
Reference Library Catalogue

Access to Justice in Courts and Tribunals: (Record no. 895)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02258nam a22001817a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20241127111417.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240819b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## -
--
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Access to Justice in Courts and Tribunals:
Remainder of title Residential Tenancies in New South Wales (1971-2001_
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Australia
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Alternative Law Journal
Date of publication, distribution, etc. June 2006
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 4 pp
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note KEYWORDS: Residential tribunal; renting; tenancy; Waverly Local Court; Local Court
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Some years ago in the Alternative Law Journal, James Taylor offered an important critical perspective on the operation of the Residential Tenancies Tribunal. The Tribunal, now incorporated into an enlarged Consumer, Trader and Tenancies Tribunal, has almost complete jurisdiction over residential tenancy disputes in New South Wales. Similar models exist in most Australian jurisdictions. Taylor identified three particular problems that beset the Tribunal in relation to the rights of tenants. First, the informality operates to disadvantage tenants because landlords, commonly being repeat players, work the Tribunal and its procedures to their advantage; tenants, by contrast, usually appear in the Tribunal once only, and having no such experience, are in a weaker position. Second, the generally restricted right to representation is unfair because landlords are allowed to be represented by real estate agents. Third, community education about the Act and the Tribunal is inadequate.<br/><br/>This article offers an updated and more detailed empirical examination of the Tribunal, not so much by reference to general principles of procedural justice as Taylor’s article did, but by comparison with the historical antecedent of the present regime. I am referring here to the Local Courts, where residential tenancy matters were almost exclusively heard before 1989. My research has examined residential tenancy disputes before the Court since 1971, and compared the results with disputes before the Tribunal. The data generally suggests that the Tribunal represents a significant success story in terms of access to justice.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Tribunal
9 (RLIN) 511
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AltLawJl/2006/19.html">https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AltLawJl/2006/19.html</a>
Public note Access item on Auslii
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Use restrictions Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Date last seen Uniform Resource Identifier Price effective from Koha item type Public note
No   Dewey Decimal Classification No Yes No tunsw tunsw 19/08/2024   19/08/2024 https://cfiles.tenantsunion.org.au/s/Srd9WToatRYSFGR 19/08/2024 Article  
No   Dewey Decimal Classification No   No tunsw tunsw 19/08/2024   19/08/2024 https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AltLawJl/2006/19.html 19/08/2024 Article Access on Auslii