HomeTenants' Union of NSW
Reference Library Catalogue
Image from Google Jackets

Comment on Chester Hartman and David Robinson's “Evictions : The hidden housing problem" — protection or protraction?

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Housing Policy Debate, 2003.Description: 14 pagesISSN:
  • 2152-050X
Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Since the 1960s, judges and legislatures have made it increasingly difficult for landlords to evict tenants even in those instances where tenants have breached their leases. Sometimes, the growth of tenant protections has actually harmed law-abiding tenants by raising costs to landlords and allowing rule-breakers to remain in their apartments. Most landlords and tenants should want a system of laws that provides for both fair and efficient eviction procedures. Tenants should be entitled to legal representation when they are threatened with eviction, but their attorneys should not use the legal system to obtain free accommodations for their clients. In the end, efforts to improve the housing of low- and moderate-income households should rely not on setting up impediments to eviction, but rather on increasing tenants’ ability to afford housing and reducing the cost of housing development and operation.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library URL Status
Article tunsw Access Item Available

KEYWORDS: Evictions, housing policy, involuntary moves

To cite this article: Michael H. Schill (2003) Comment on Chester Hartman and David Robinson's “evictions: The hidden housing problem"—protection or protraction?, Housing Policy Debate, 14:4, 503-515, DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2003.9521484

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.