000			01842nam a22002177a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230223113708.0
008			210616b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a978-1-7404-4079-0
100			_9263 _aRandolph, Bill
245			_aDefining social exclusion in western Sydney : _bexploring the role of housing tenure
260			_bCity Futures, _cOctober 2007.
300			_a46 pages
500			_aKEYWORDS: Social Exclusion, housing tenure
520			_aOver the past decade social exclusion has increasingly been positioned at the forefront of political, academic and lay discourse as the cause of disadvantage (Marsh, 2004). While the definition, measurement and solutions to social exclusion remain open to debate, housing has progressively been positioned as a central variable creating neighbourhoods of exclusion. Much of this debate has positioned areas of public housing as the most disadvantaged and socially excluded neighbourhoods. However, the multiplicity of social exclusion questions the simple identification of areas of public housing as the most excluded. By exploring six dimensions of exclusion (neighbourhood, social and civic engagement, access, crime and security, community identify and economic disadvantage) we argue that there is relatively little difference between areas dominated by public housing and those characterised by private rental for each of these individual dimensions of exclusion (with a number of exceptions). Rather, it is the experience of multiple dimensions of exclusion which marks areas of public housing as unique.
650		0	_9504 _aSocial Exclusion _zNSW
700			_9265 _aMurray, Dominique
700			_9262 _aRuming, Kristian
856			_uhttps://www.be.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/upload/researchpaper10.pdf _yView item on publishers website
942			_2ddc _cA
999			_c332 _d332