000 | 01769nam a22001937a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230627154232.0 | ||
008 | 210804b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a04305027 | ||
100 |
_9536 _aSlater, Tom |
||
245 | _aRent control and housing justice | ||
260 |
_bFinisterra, _c2020. |
||
300 | _a18 pages | ||
500 | _aKEYWORDS: Rent control; housing; agnotology; displacement; housing justice | ||
520 | _a In this article I explore the question of rent control: one of the most despised yet misunderstood policies across a variety of disciplines and professions concerned with urban and housing issues. The hegemonic view is that rent controls – in any form, in any context – will eventually hurt those on whose behalf they are supposedly introduced (people struggling to find somewhere affordable to live). I use the concept of agnotology – the study of the intentional production of ignorance – to demonstrate that this view is riddled with vested interests and grounded in deep contempt for state regulation and in veneration of the supposed “efficiency” of the “free” market. I expose and dissect three of the prevalent myths of rent control: (1) that it negatively affects the quality of rented properties; (2) that it negatively affects the supply of housing; and (3) that it leads to ‘inefficiencies’ in housing markets. I take a close look at different kinds of rent control and, more broadly, at what leads to high housing costs, and by doing so I shift the analytical and political focus towards the urgent question of housing justice. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aPrivate Rental _zInternational _9501 |
|
856 |
_uhttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/finisterra/article/view/19772/15475 _yView item on publishers website |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cA |
||
999 |
_c518 _d518 |